The chart above shows the seasonal index for the S&P. Of immediate note is that the seasonal path is forecasting the action to play out something fairly close to what the time cycles are suggesting, with a particular emphasis on a January high giving way to weakness into February or March, then turning stronger off the same into early-Summer. From there, the seasonal index would suggest weakness into the Autumn months – followed by the normal year-end strength.

The year 2013 puts the various indexes into post-election year inside the ‘presidential cycle’ pattern. We know from the overall history of this particular pattern that the first two years after a presidential election tend to be weaker, forming an important bottom in the second year (here, this would be the
year 2014), before turning sharply higher again in the following two years – and into the next presidential election period.

With the above said and noted, the chart above shows the what the average ‘post-election’ year looks like inside the presidential cycle. Similar to the seasonal index, we can once again see something along the lines of what the time cycles are forecasting, which is a mid-February low - strength into the Summer months – followed by weakness into the Autumn, then the potential for strength again into year-end. The only hard deviation here is that this ‘post-election/presidential-cycle’ chart would
forecast the strength that is seen into Summer to peak into late-July or early-August, while the time cycles are suggesting month of June for a peak. Also, the above chart shows the Autumn bottom coming in around early-November, while the time cycle forecast shows late-September.

The chart above shows the Bradley Indicator’s turning point forecast for the year 2013. Of first note is that there are two smaller turns with the Bradley for the current month, with the first being around January 20th, and the second being set for January 29th. This does not offer up much in the way of information, as turns with the Bradley can be plus or minus 4 trading days in either direction.

However, the real major turn with the 2013 Bradley is shown for mid-June (i.e., June 22nd), which is within the range of the time cycle’s forecast path of a May/June high – and also the seasonal path for the same (and, at least semi-closely, the ‘post-election’ presidential cycle path). From there, the Bradley’s next major turn does not come in until the Autumn of 2013, shown for October 8th – which would certainly be in line with a potential  late-September bottom with the time and the seasonal cycles.

Having said and noted the above, with that, of all of the indicators/cycles that I track, I consider the Bradley indicator to be the least reliable for forecasting and trading, as most of the turns with the same can be very hit and miss. Even said, I know that there are those who certainly swear by it (each to his own). Regardless, we should be keeping an eye on the key dates of mid-to-late June and early-October of this year.

Lastly, I would be amiss if I did not include Martin Armstrong’s ‘8.6 year Global Business Cycle’ model. While I don’t put a ton of weight on this model (due to it’s longer-term nature), the spreadsheet that I keep for these turns is shown below:

Note that the last major turn with the Armstrong model was June 12, 2011 – which did not turn out
to be anything of significance - even though the October, 2011 timeframe did end up being the last major (‘second-phase’) bottom within the four-year time cycle. Regardless, the next major turn is set for August of this year – which could actually take on a greater-degree of importance, simply due to the fact that each of the time/cycles, seasonals, Bradley, are looking for a major turning point high into within a month or two of that same timeframe. Stepping back further, the next major turn that follows with the Armstrong model is shown for September of 2014, which is also of some note, again due to the position of the four-year time cycle.

With all said and noted, taking the combination of the cycles, seasonals, ‘presidential cycle’ – and the Bradley indicator – and the overall bottom line for the year 2013 tends to favor a high in January giving way to weakness into February, back to or below 70-day moving average. From there, if that low is also able to remain above the 11/16/12 low of 1343.35 on the S&P (as the odds tend to favor) - and
ideally above the late-December bottom of 1398.11 - then we should see a rally in the range of 9-14% into early-Summer (June, plus or minus), a move which ends up topping the larger 360-day time cycle.

From a high made around early-Summer of this year, the risks will then move to the downside into
later in the year, with the probabilities favoring a correction in the range of 18% or greater (plus or minus) into the Autumn months, eventually setting up a low between late-September (with the time cycles), but which could easily stretch out into mid-to-late October (as per seasonals) or even very early-November (with the ‘presidential cycle’). From there, a strong seasonal rally will ideally take
hold into year-end - which could potentially push out into the Spring of 2014 before re-topping.

Jim Curry
Market Turns Advisory
Email: jcurry@cycle-wave.com

Website 1: http://cyclewave.homestead.com/
Website 2: http://www.stockindextimer.com/



Disclaimer - The financial markets are risky. Investing is risky. Past performance does not guarantee future performance. The foregoing has been prepared solely for informational purposes and is not a solicitation, or an offer to buy or sell any security. Opinions are based on historical research and data believed reliable, but there is no guarantee that future results will be profitable. The market can and will do the unexpected, use sell stops to assist in risk avoidance. Not responsible for errors or omissions. Copyright 1998-2013, Jim Curry

As we forge ahead into the year 2013, I wanted to post an article going over the complete yearly
forecast path, as suggested by the various time cycles that I track - and also with other indicators
such as seasonal patterns, the Bradley indicator, and also the post-election ‘presidential cycle’ pattern
in stocks.

With the above said and noted, the projected path for 2013 looks somewhat similar to that seen in
2012, though with a larger percentage correction being expected in the second-half of the year –
primarily due to the position of the larger 180-day, 360-day (18-month) and four-year cycles. In-
between, there should the normal up-and-down gyrations along the way, ideally with a peak in here
in January ideally giving way to a low in February, prior to returning to strength again into late-Spring
or early-Summer, setting up for that important top with the 360-day wave.

As for the various time cycles that I track, the 45-day cycle is seen as 10 days along and is currently
labeled as bullish. The 90-day cycle is seen as 40 days along and is also labeled as bullish, while the
larger 180-day wave is seen as 40 days along and is regarded as bullish. The 360-day cycle is 322
days along and is currently labeled as neutral, while the four-year cycle is 972 days along and is also
regarded as neutral at the present time.



The chart above shows the time cycle’s basic forecast path for the year 2013, a path which combines
the currently-viewed position of each of the cycles from the 45-day wave, on up to the 360-day
component. Overall, the basic path shown favors a high around mid-January (plus or minus), drop
into early-to-mid February or later (i.e., 45/90-day bottom) - and then strength again off the same into
the June timeframe, plus or minus. From there, the forecast would be looking for weakness into early-
Autumn (late-September or beyond), before giving way to the normal seasonal strength into year-
end – but which would most likely carry over into the Spring of 2014.

I should quickly point out that the above forecast is only a very generalized expectation of the path
that the S&P 500 index is favored to take in 2013. As I have mentioned before, I don’t see a
‘perfect order’ in the markets; that is, there is only a degree of semi-predictability - at best. With that,
we need to use the above as only an approximate guide/roadmap going forward, with the normal
adjustments to be made along the way, always using the accompanying technical action from indicators
such as breadth, volume, and sentiment as additional (and just-as-important) guidelines for
navigating/trading the markets.

Heading into the year 2013, the S&P 500 has a new yearly projected resistance high of 1554, with
a yearly projected support low of 1356. With that, if the time-cycle’s forecast path is going to play
out at least semi-closely to as shown, then the best-odds for a test of this 1554 yearly projected
resistance high would appear to be around June of this year, plus or minus a month. The best spot
for a test of the 1356 yearly projected support low looks to be either the February bottom, or, alternately
(and more likely), the low that is due into the Autumn months with the 360-day wave. However, there
are other variables which we will need to take a look at, up to and including the post-election
‘Presidential cycle’ pattern - as well as the normal seasonal tendencies. For now, however, we will
start with the various time cycles.

For the smaller 45 and 90-day cycles, it is these two waves that should be responsible for the next
good swing top on the S&P 500, with hard resistance to the same at or within 10 points of the 1500
level. It is also these two cycles that should give way to the peak shown for mid-January (plus or
minus), via the 2013 forecast path shown earlier.

In terms of price, once this 45/90-day combination peak is in place, then we should expect a minimum
decline back to the 70-day moving average on or around early-to-mid February. Note that the 70-day
moving average is at the 1424 figure and is flatlining at the present time. Having said that, I should add
that there is at least some potential for a drop back to the 200-day moving average or lower at the
February cycle bottom, though right now I am leaning the odds in favor of the late-December low
of 1398.11 (plus or minus) to hold the upcoming 45/90-day downward phase.

Stepping back, though the market is only semi-predictable (at best), if we simply look at patterns
we can give very good odds that the probabilities will favor the February bottom also holding at or
well above the 11/16/12 low of 1343.35 on the SPX. If correct, then the odds are in the range of
80%-or-better that higher highs will follow on the next swing up with the 90-day cycle, with the
average rally with this component being around 14% off the bottom, but with the greater-majority
seeing upward phases of 9% or greater. In other words, following a low around mid-February (plus
or minus), we should be able to discern that a rally in the range of 9-14% (or more) will be seen into
around the month of June of this year, which is plus or minus a month in either direction.

With the above said and noted, if we use some early-speculation and make the inference that the
1425 figure on the S&P 500 could end up as a potential bottom for the 45/90-day cycles into February
(a figure which is near the 70-day moving average - but which may or may not end up as correct as
the low for these waves), a minimum 9% rally would infer a move to the 1552 figure or better into
early-Summer. Note how this is in line with the yearly projected resistance high of 1554, which, as
noted earlier, has the best-odds of being hit on or around the month of June. For the bigger picture,
of secondary note is that a test of the 1550’s would be right into the open targets from some of the
larger cycles, which I will go into next.

Stepping back, the last bottom for the 180-day cycle is currently deemed to have been registered
at the 11/16/12 low of 1343.35 on the SPX, thus putting this wave at some 40 days along at the
present time. In terms of patterns, this 180-day wave then registered the pattern of a ‘higher-low’ at
that bottom, in that it held above the 6/4/12 bottom of 1266.74 on the SPX. And, in terms of time,
when this particular pattern has been seen in the past with this wave, the average upward phase that
followed - before this cycle re-topped - took approximately 116 trading days before completing. In
other words, if that is seen on the current rotation, then the inference would tend to favor strength into
early-May of this year (or later).

In terms of price, this 180-day cycle recently confirmed a new upside target to the 1516.89 – 1545.50
level for the S&P 500. Going a bit further, statistically speaking I should add that the greater-majority
of the upward phases with this wave have seen rallies of 15% or better off the bottom, which – if seen
on the current rotation – would infer at least the potential for a push up to the 1538 figure or better in
the coming months.

With the above said and noted, we can make a decent inference that the probabilities favor this cycle
not trying to top-out prior to May of this year, with the 1516 level on the S&P being a minimum
target with the same - but with at least the potential for prices to push up to the 1538-1554 area or
better before all is said and done. From there, this cycle’s next low is scheduled for August of 2013
or later, though more than likely it will be made around September/October of this year, in line with the
larger 360-day wave, which we will take a look at next.

Stepping back further, the next major top on the S&P should come from the nominal 360-day cycle,
which is currently 322 days along from it’s last known trough, made back in early-October of 2011.
recent rotations of this cycle have been averaging closer to 470 days, and with that, it’s next bottom
is currently projected to materialize sometime around the Autumn of this year, where it has a marked
tendency to low-out (i.e., the months of September - October).

In terms of price, very early in 2012 an initial 360-day cycle target to 1427.63 – 1486.25 was given on
the S&P, which was satisfied back in September, 2012 (chart, above). There was also a second upside
target that was confirmed for this index to the 1462.64 – 1514.80 area, which was also met back in
September. A third upside target was later triggered to the 1514.88 – 1588.24 region on the S&P – a
projection which is still open at the present time, and overlaps the earlier-noted 180-day target range.

Going further with the above, the peak that is forecast around the month of June with the combination
of cycles, seasonals - and the post-election/‘presidential-cycle’ pattern – should come as the result of
the topping of this 360-day cycle. Also, since no new upside targets can be generated with this wave, the
probabilities are strong that this highest upside target will end up topping the move up into May/June.

Stepping back, once this 360-day wave does peak, then it’s average percentage decline (when coming
off the pattern of a ‘higher-high’) has been around 18% from peak-to-trough. In other words, from a
high made around early-Summer of this year, we should be looking at a decline of around 18% off the
top (plus or minus), bottoming between late-September and early-November of this year. From there,
we should be probably looking at test of the 1356 yearly projected support low (or lower), then to give
way to a sharp rally off the same into year-end.

The four-year cycle’s last bottom is the 3/6/09 low of 666.79 on the SPX, which puts it at 972 trading
days along from the same, currently labeled as neutral. This four-year wave is in the process of going
over a very wide top - and with that is looking set to peak at anytime going forward, though with a
particular focus on early-Summer of this year.

In terms of price, (and noted in prior articles) back in November of 2010 the four-year cycle had
confirmed it’s original upside target to the 1423.17 – 1591.25 SPX CASH area, which was met
nearly two years later - doing so back in the month of August of 2012. Having said that, early in 2012
a second upside target was then confirmed with this component to the 1504.17 – 1625.83 region, a
target which is still valid at the present time.

In terms of patterns, of particular mention here is that this four year cycle will usually take the shape of
a ‘three phase’ affair, normally consisting of three smaller sub-cycles - each of these averaging around
18-months each; in other words, three rotations of the smaller 360-day cycle. Approximately 85% of
the peaks with this four-year component are made in either the second or the third upward phase. With
that, we are currently in that third upward phase right now, which began at the 10/4/11 low of 1074.77
on the S&P.

For the bigger picture then, this four-year cycle is looking for a peak at anytime going forward, but
ideally will do so from higher levels - and (even better) from a peak that forms around early-Summer.
Regardless, from whatever high that ends up being seen with this cycle, it’s average decline from peak-
to-trough in the past has been approximately 35.4%, lasting around 7-16 months before bottoming.
Going further, the ‘second phase’ low (within the noted ‘three-phase’ pattern) has 80%-or-better odds
of being tested or taken out to the downside as this wave bottoms. That ‘second phase’ low, as noted
above, is the 10/4/11 bottom of 1074.77 on the S&P - thus giving us an idea of the downside risk for
the next correction phase of this component.

In terms of time, the next bottom for this four-year time cycle is due anywhere between the Autumn of
2013 and around mid-2014. Going further, since we know that the next 360-day downward phase is
due to bottom out around the Autumn of this year, the indications have been that this low would be the
odds-on favorite to end up as the bottom for this four-year wave. If that should end up as the case, then
the downside risks will increase from an 18% decline from a Summer peak into an Autumn bottom, to a
whopping 35% - which is again the average correction phase for the larger four-year component.